|
|
| Red Faction : Lounge : your frame rate record |
[Forum Rules] |
| jileb |
  Posted 26th Apr 2006 3:38am |
L4Y Member
Post 62 / 111
 |
250 fps in CSS |
|
|
| General_187 |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 4:31am |
L4Y Member
Post 468 / 496
 |
it's in the sig |
| 3D Mark '01 My score is 25,472! BEAT IT PUNK! |
|
|
| Bigblack40 |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 5:14am |  |
L4Y Member
Post 154 / 1150
 |
| Quoting Night Stalker | my was 1500fps in dungen siege  |
That game dsnt have gud graphics i get 1607fps in dugen Siege |
|
|
NoClanFrank  |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 5:29am | |
Post 2647 / 5840
 |
| Quoting General_187 | | it's in the sig |
You say it's in the sig but all I see is the test score, it doesn't stated the frame rate. Which is what the question that was asked.
Also, I dislike you. I barely got over 21,000 but then again I don't really have a gaming motherboard. 
2nd also, you sig is just a link to the software NOT to your published results. Did you forget to publish the results?  |
| >Click Here< If You Don't Have a Social Life :/ |
|
|
| General_187 |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 5:54am |
L4Y Member
Post 469 / 496
|
can you publish results on the free version... i didn't know it was possible
*off to bed* |
| 3D Mark '01 My score is 25,472! BEAT IT PUNK! |
Modified Apr 26th, 05:55am by General_187 |
|
| Tech_N9ne |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 6:52am |
L4Y Member
Post 102 / 163
 |
11 fps, 9 while shooting/moving, now you all can understand why I dont play RF anymore.
It maybe technologically obsolete, but it can still compile code, so its not funtionally obsolete. |
|
|
| skvlad01 |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 1:53pm |
L4Y Member
Post 317 / 614
 |
my test was in UT2004 with the highest graphic seting on free look mode in the map Iron Deity.
A big factor is cpu and gpu temperture, makes the diference of 100 FPS on the high end of frame rate. 1 of the resons i get such a high FPS in UT2004 is coz my box is water cooled. AMD 64 3000 socket 939 runing at only 20oC at the moment and never gets over 43-44 on a 35oC day in sumer on full load. |
Artificial intellect is no match for natural stupidity!
www.extremerigs.com.au
While not gaming, Fold. Help the fight against disease |
Modified Apr 26th, 01:55pm by skvlad01 |
|
| Garner |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 2:08pm | |
Post 2148 / 4125
 |
[pedantic mode on]
Technically speaking the most you've actually achieved is more like 60-120 depending on your monitor. Your graphics card may be capable of that FPS but if your monitor only refreshes 60 times a second... you're going to be hard pressed to get more than 60  |
"Science is this extraordinary transnational, transcultural, trans-everything language which is the only way to discover Truth and its regrettable that billions are still stuck in the Middle Ages believing the crap propagated by Popes and priests..."
- Peter Atkins |
|
|
Assaultman67  |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 4:08pm | |
Post 1077 / 4376
 |
your FPS is way to dependant on what the map your playing is, where you are in it, your settings and your computer.
if i set my settings to the lowest possible setting and played in a map that was a simple box it would be easy to get very high fps
but garners right ... it actually depends on your monitior  |
|
|
| ExoStatic |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 4:53pm |
L4Y Member
Post 805 / 875
 |
No point even having over like 75 fps... the human eye can only see at 75fps max (or 65, i don't remember), anymore than that it all looks the same so.. having over that really doesn't make a difference |
| Back in RF... getting back into the swing of things! |
|
|
| Garner |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 6:00pm | |
Post 2151 / 4125
|
The human eye interprets sequential frames lower than 25fps (ish) as individual jerky images. Over 25 it begins to blend them in together to make a smooth image.
However Exo is right... the upper limit for the number of FPS your eye can 'read' is up around the 75 mark. It varies from person to person but 75-100 is a rough max guide.
Just like the TV can only draw so many frames per second, your eyes can only read and interpret so many frames per second.
Its why I'm happy with 60 fps in any game... (I play in 1280*1024 in everything - native res of the TFT's I've got) sure... you can go spend $500 on a new graphics card that can do 100+... but whats the point... you're not going to even notice the extra |
"Science is this extraordinary transnational, transcultural, trans-everything language which is the only way to discover Truth and its regrettable that billions are still stuck in the Middle Ages believing the crap propagated by Popes and priests..."
- Peter Atkins |
|
|
| Assaultman67 |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 6:11pm | |
Post 1078 / 4376
|
The only reasonto have such a high performance grafics card is fora high performance game ...right now i could probably run RF on a really cheap video card or integrated video and not notice a difference.
but when you get games like UT2007... you might need a 200$ video card  .
Ive noticed in UT 2004 i get somewhat crappy FPS (like 30) in places with lots of detail (like some of the city ONS maps). but most of the time itruns pretty smooth. |
|
|
| ExoStatic |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 6:17pm |
L4Y Member
Post 806 / 875
|
You class 30 fps as CRAPPY? Man, you're spoiled...
I get about 28fps with CSS and about 22 while fighting... with pretty high settings.. I'd love 30fps in games like Halo and HL2... |
| Back in RF... getting back into the swing of things! |
|
|
| NoClanFrank |
Posted 26th Apr 2006 7:15pm | |
Post 2651 / 5840
|
I might add, if you have your refresh rate on your monitor then you might get headaches from staring at the monitor too long. I persoanlly won't go below 70. I have mine set at 85 but be careful, you should first make sure your monitor can support the higher refresh rate. Also having it set at a higher refresh rate kills your monitor sooner. |
| >Click Here< If You Don't Have a Social Life :/ |
|
|
| LordSeafood |
Posted 27th Apr 2006 1:00am | |
L4Y Member
Post 1070 / 1792
 |
| Quoting ExoStatic | You class 30 fps as CRAPPY? Man, you're spoiled...
I get about 28fps with CSS and about 22 while fighting... with pretty high settings.. I'd love 30fps in games like Halo and HL2... |
30 in UT2k4 is actually quite bad, CSS on the other hand does need a better graphics card to get the higher FPS.
With mine i usually get around 30 - 120 fps in CSS and 120+ in UT2k4 (it does go lower though, just not often) |
| P.S. Still Alive. |
Modified Apr 27th, 01:01am by LordSeafood |
|
Page 1
Multiple Page Topic : 1 2 |
    |
|
|
|
